Pilot Discernment Tool

CRM Discernment Grid

A pilot decision aid with unknown values, ordinal judgments, and a repair record. A sound commitment can remain under pressure. The proposed CRM integration has not been empirically validated; this tool supplies no diagnosis or verified outcome.

Format: Tool
Stage: Pilot
Time: 5 min

Cognitive Resonance Model

Separate expectation mismatch from pressure on meaning, then identify a fitting response. These ordinal judgments are a proposed decision aid, not a diagnosis, validated score, or measure of guilt.

Care and safety never depend on completing this tool, disclosure, confrontation, or reconciliation. Checked steps are proposals, not evidence that anyone acted.

Prediction errorHow much did the event differ from a specific prior expectation? Unknown differs from no mismatch.Meaning gapHow much pressure falls on identity, duty, hope, or faith? An expected loss can hurt deeply while a commitment remains true.

Source trustCapacity

Low error → High errorLow gap → High gap

Possible next steps: select only what is warranted and practicable

Verify the evidence or sourceSeek trustworthy counselProtect, pause, or stop exposureTake one truthful action or repair stepWait with a dated review point

Working CRM profile

Two axesPE Unknown / not yet assessed · MG Unknown / not yet assessed

QualifiersUnknown · Unknown: assess actual conditions and support · not yet named

Discernment boundaryKeep the profile open until both axes and actual capacity are assessed. Missing information does not imply low pressure, impaired capacity, or a need to change a belief.

Repair and receipt record

Optional notes stay only in this open page and clear on reload. Avoid identifying details. Locate the actual problem and preserve sound commitments; the injured person may need another person's or office's action.

What occurred? Mark reports and uncertainty.Which prior expectation, if any, failed?Which commitment or hope is under pressure?What needs repair, support, or preservation?Whose good is at stake?Who can act, with what authority or help?First step, support needed, and review dateWhat reached the recipient? Evidence and remaining loss

Working notes only. Name the object, recipient, responsible actor, and step with review before treating this as a plan.

Preset scenarios

Read the CRM book and its limits

Learning purpose

CRM is a proposed integration and decision aid, not an empirically validated model. Keep unknown values distinct from zero, expectation mismatch distinct from pressure on a possibly sound commitment, and proposed action distinct from received, persistent benefit. Ordinal inputs do not establish diagnosis, guilt, or repair.

Source hierarchy

Current English Divine Design Framework, chapter 15 and Appendix D
Canonical Cognitive Resonance Model companion book, including its validation limits

Review and corrections

Source review checks the two axes, source trust, actual capacity, warranted action, repair object, recipient, responsible actor, receipt, and protection boundary against current DDF chapter 15, Appendix D, and the canonical CRM book. Constructed scenarios are examples, not participant evidence or clinical validation.

The tool must remain labeled pilot and must change whenever the canonical CRM field specification or safety boundary changes.