All tracks. watch one case move through the whole model before the formal specification begins.
Use the model first as a way of slowing down. The example below is not a template for every case. It shows the order: name the signal, separate fact-pressure from meaning-pressure, check the channel, check capacity, watch for false closure, choose one truthful action, and review later.
Maya is thirty-eight. She has worked carefully, served faithfully, and quietly lived with a meaning frame she rarely states out loud: if she is responsible, useful, and spiritually serious, life will remain basically stable. Then a physician tells her that her bloodwork and imaging are concerning and that she needs further testing for a possible autoimmune condition.
Her first pressure is factual. Her body is not doing what she expected. The plan for the year suddenly looks unreliable. The second pressure is meaning-level. If her body can fail without warning, if usefulness cannot guarantee stability, and if prayer does not remove uncertainty on command, then the meaning frame she has been living by is too small for reality.
Initial profile. PE2 / MG3 / ST-high / CAP-yellow / AG-refer + AG-lament + AG-wait.
- Field | Maya's working record
- Incoming signal | Abnormal tests and medical concern require specialist follow-up.
- Expected model | Responsible life, usefulness, prayer, and careful habits should keep life stable.
- Meaning frame under pressure | Weakness, dependence, uncertainty, and illness feel like threats to identity and faith.
- Source trust | High enough to act: qualified tests and medical interpretation, with further specialist review needed.
- Capacity | Yellow: tired, ashamed, frightened, and tempted to force meaning before receiving care.
- Truthful action | Follow medical referral, tell safe people, write questions, lament, and schedule review after better information.
The source is strong enough to take seriously: qualified medical testing and a physician's interpretation. Her capacity is yellow, not green, because she slept badly, feels ashamed of being weak, and wants to solve the meaning of the illness before she even has the diagnosis. The first truthful action is not to explain the whole event. It is to schedule the specialist visit, tell two safe people, write down her questions, and make room for lament without forcing a lesson.
False resonance tempts her in three directions. Denial says the doctor is probably overreacting. Spiritual bypass says she should be peaceful immediately if she really trusts God. Collapse says the diagnosis proves her whole life of responsibility was meaningless. All three reduce pressure quickly, but all three lose contact with reality.
At review, two weeks later, the facts have changed. The specialist says the condition is serious but treatable. Prediction error drops because the medical model is clearer. Meaning gap remains high but is no longer chaotic. Maya's revised meaning frame is not responsibility keeps me safe. It is closer to this: my body is finite, my life is still meaningful, care is not failure, and uncertainty can be met truthfully with help. Her action changes too: treatment, adjusted work, honest prayer, and a slower schedule.
In this constructed example, the record directs attention to care, uncertainty, and an unsupported promise of immunity. It illustrates the response the protocol seeks. Whether CRM helps actual people avoid these errors requires comparison with competent existing care.
Related research
Compare this chapter with source documents or study its biblical references.
Chapter comments