---
schema_version: "1.0.0"
id: "rethinkreality:en:chapter-7"
work_id: "urn:systemstheology:book:rethinkreality:chapter:chapter-7"
book_id: "rethinkreality"
chapter_id: "evil-suffering-and-decay"
chapter_slug: "chapter-7"
title: "Evil, Suffering, and Decay"
book_title: "Rethinking Reality"
language: "en"
source_language: "en"
translation_status: "source"
authors: ["Elijah Faviel"]
editorial_owner: "Systems Theology"
editors: []
review_status: "not_specified"
reviewers: []
content_version: "content-43ddead931bc"
content_hash_sha256: "43ddead931bcfb05885e5bbee2f804d64e3f5f40548c528ad21db79323e027be"
published_at: "2026-02-28T18:58:53.000Z"
modified_at: "2026-07-15T23:50:19.254Z"
canonical_url: "https://systemstheology.com/library/rethinkreality/chapter-7/"
markdown_url: "https://systemstheology.com/research/books/rethinkreality/en/chapter-7.md"
license: "All rights reserved; research use subject to the Use Policy"
license_url: "https://systemstheology.com/use-policy/"
correction_url: "https://systemstheology.com/library/rethinkreality/chapter-7/#chapter-comments"
---
# Evil, Suffering, and Decay
## Suffering, Decay, and Careful Discernment
When people suffer, they do not experience it as an abstraction. A person grieving a child, enduring abuse, losing a parent, fighting illness, or watching an animal suffer is not facing a clean puzzle on a whiteboard. Pain comes through bodies, rooms, families, memories, and histories.
Suffering also comes from more than one source, and the source changes what faithfulness requires. Natural fragility, moral evil, demonic exploitation, formative trials, trauma, hiddenness, animal pain, and unresolved mystery cannot be collapsed into one word without doing damage. Earthquakes, disease, predation, abuse, murder, addiction, and idolatry are not the same kind of thing. If those realities are blurred together, we begin saying false things about God, victims, responsibility, and repair.
God's action also has to be named with care. What God directly causes, what He permits, what He judges, and what He redeems are not the same act. The more carefully we study suffering, decay, trauma, addiction, and moral formation, the more exact our language should become. Explanation should make compassion and responsibility more precise, not colder or flatter.
### Why Suffering Is Permitted
Any answer that makes suffering neat is already false to the experience of suffering. We should not stand over grief with an explanation that makes it feel small. Some analogies can still help us understand how formation works under pressure, as long as they never pretend grief has been solved by comparison.
Some human goods exist only as exercised relations in a world with real resistance: courage answers danger, patience endures delay, fidelity keeps a costly promise, and mercy answers wrong without calling it good. We are not formed by theory alone, but by choices under pressure, costly obedience, help received and given, and course correction over time.
That claim must not be smuggled in through a machine-learning story about "negative examples." Models can learn categories in more than one way, and no person's horror is training data for another's virtue. At most, formation establishes that some real resistance, consequence, and risk are conditions for certain mature goods. It does not establish the need for any particular atrocity, victim, intensity, or distribution of pain.
A frictionless world would leave many capacities unformed. Where no choice carries cost, risk, or resistance, there is no meaningful formation, only untested potential.
Suffering is never the destination or an automatic good. In a broken world, God can refine character and make love durable through hard seasons while still naming evil as evil. The moral account remains indexed to the person who was harmed: benefits elsewhere never cancel that victim's loss. A complete Christian answer must reach that same person through resurrection, truthful disclosure and judgment, healing, vindication, and fitting restitution.
### Gratuitous Evil and Moral Discernment
Gratuitous evil means suffering that appears pointless. Scripture gives us real moral discernment, though it is limited: conscience bears witness (Romans 2:15, NIV), and the Spirit convicts of sin, righteousness, and judgment (John 16:8, NIV).
One distinction keeps the discussion clear: pain, loss, and death are tragic, but they are not automatically moral evil. An earthquake that kills people is terrible, but it is not the same kind of act as murder. Scripture describes creaturely life that includes hunger, predation, and mortality inside God's providence (Psalm 104:21; Job 38:39--41, NIV). Moral culpability enters through responsible agency, but not only when a person explicitly thinks, "I know this is wrong." Intentional cruelty, omission, reckless or negligent harm, willful blindness, culpable ignorance, failed role duties, moralized violence, and knowing participation in harmful systems can all be blameworthy. Responsibility must track available light, intent, foresight, control, coercion, role, capacity, and response to correction and repair; involuntary harm is not automatically guilt.
The evidential problem of evil asks what follows if some suffering has no justifying reason at all. [^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-1] Rowe's fawn case is the classic example: severe suffering with no obvious human lesson or immediate moral payoff. [^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-2] This objection has real force. If suffering were the only thing we counted, many people would conclude against God. But Christian faith asks us to look at the whole picture: conscience, reason, history, and the claim that God has acted in Christ.
One step in that argument needs care: our inability to see a justifying reason may reflect a real limit in our knowledge. A child watching surgery may read the surgeon's cuts as pointless harm while lacking the surgeon's knowledge. If that kind of gap is possible, the move from appearance to final reality is less direct. [^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-3] Our duty in the face of visible harm remains immediate: protect the vulnerable, pursue justice, and do the good we can see in front of us (Isa 1:17; Luke 10:33--37, NIV). Scripture's arc is not "people can fix this alone," but people failing, Christ coming, and the Spirit being given to guide and empower obedience (John 14:26; 16:13; Acts 1:8, NIV). So when a Christian sees a wildfire and helps put it out, that is not "thwarting God's plan." It can be one way God works through people who are aligning with Him.
Sources of suffering also differ. Some comes from creation's fragility: disease, disaster, predation, and decay. Some comes from people: abuse, betrayal, exploitation, and cruelty. Human sin often begins as shortcut logic, then hardens. Some people become so corrupted that they no longer harm only for gain or convenience; they begin to seek destruction itself (Prov 4:16; Rom 1:28--32, NIV).
The animal question belongs here. Scripture is clear about human vocation: steward creation (Gen 1:26--28, NIV), tend it (Gen 2:15, NIV), and treat animals with care (Prov 12:10, NIV). It leaves much of the deep-time animal story undisclosed while making creaturely suffering morally relevant to human stewards. If humans are appointed caretakers, noticing and resisting creaturely suffering is part of our role. I respect people who care deeply about animals, because that concern often shows humans functioning as intended: caretakers of life, not careless destroyers.
This also helps with the "perfect system" question. In Genesis, "very good" (Genesis 1:31 (NIV)) is not passive stasis. Humans are created good and immediately given work, boundaries, and responsibility (Gen 1:28; 2:15--17, NIV). Creation is good and ordered, yet entrusted and unfolding in history. In that frame, nonhuman biological mortality can predate the Fall, while Romans 5:12 (NIV) focuses on death-through-sin entering the human story through Adam and spreading to all people.
Prehuman animal suffering remains a hard and serious problem. Romans 5 addresses human rebellion and human death under sin within that larger history. The evolution, Adam, and death question becomes central in chapter "From Cosmos to Creature: Biology, Mind, and Human Formation". Some suffering was never in human reach at all. This exposes creation's distance from its healed end state and directs our present calling: to reach as far as we can now. Where suffering is within our reach and we refuse to act, that failure is on us.
Romans 8:19--21 (NIV) says creation waits for liberation with redeemed humanity. The same horizon appears in Isaiah 11:9 (NIV) (They will neither harm nor destroy) and Revelation 21:4 (NIV) (no more death, mourning, crying, or pain). Restored human rule under God therefore includes the healing of creation's suffering, not only private spirituality.
DDF carries that hope one step further as an inference. Because a sentient creature's good is personal rather than interchangeable with the good of its species, renewed creation points toward healing indexed to the creatures whose lives were subject to suffering. Creature-indexed restoration is a strong DDF inference from Romans 8 and the renewed creation; Scripture leaves its precise scope and mechanism undisclosed.
What God directly causes, what God allows, what God judges, and what God redeems are not the same thing. A stable world with real cause and effect carries real cost, and it is also the kind of world where freedom, faithfulness, and character can grow. Universal prevention of every costly consequence would radically alter agency and causal learning, while the Christian claim of miracles makes selective prevention part of the question. Stable order therefore supplies a general condition rather than a sufficient reason for any particular atrocity. [^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-4] God's revealed character in Christ remains the moral reference through which every proposed reason is judged (Jas 1:13; 1 John 1:5, NIV).
The direct question remains. If God is good and powerful, why not stop every horrific act before it happens? The objection deserves real weight. [^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-5] The strongest cumulative Christian answer is not one permission rule. Creation has a reliable causal order and agents have graded but real power; providential restraint may be real even where its counterfactual extent is hidden; God's action is noncompetitive with created causes; and in Christ God enters creaturely suffering rather than observing it from a safe distance. Resurrection and judgment must then answer the same person who suffered through truthful disclosure, vindication, differentiated judgment, healing, restitution, and restored communion. Evil is defeated for the victim; it is never retroactively turned into a necessary means.
The number, severity, apparent pointlessness, and unequal distribution of cases whose permission we cannot explain remain genuine evidential pressure on DDF. Stable order and miracle both belong in the account; God's revealed will directs us to prevent what can be prevented, protect the harmed, and act faithfully where we stand.
[^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-1]: Alvin Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974); William L. Rowe, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335--341.
[^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-2]: Rowe, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.
[^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-3]: Stephen J. Wykstra, The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of Appearance, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16, no. 2 (1984): 73--93; Michael Bergmann, Skeptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil, No\^ u s 35, no. 2 (2001): 278--296.
[^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-4]: Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil; John Hick, Evil and the God of Love, rev. ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).
[^gratuitous-evil-and-moral-discernment-5]: James P. Sterba, Is a Good God Logically Possible? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019); James P. Sterba and Richard Swinburne, Could a Good God Permit So Much Suffering? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024).
#### Job and the Failure of Easy Formulas
Job refuses a lazy equation between pain and guilt. The story describes Job as righteous and upright (Job 1:8, NIV). His friends assume severe suffering must mean hidden sin, but the book rejects that formula. At the end, God says the friends have not spoken rightly about Him as Job has (Job 42:7, NIV).
Job brings his anguish to God with unusual honesty, and God answers by widening the frame beyond Job's reach (Job 38--42, NIV). Job is humbled for speaking beyond his knowledge, while his friends are rebuked for explaining suffering with false certainty. Both truths matter.
At the center of God's reply stand Behemoth and Leviathan, massive and untamed creatures that no human being can manage (Job 40--41, NIV). They carry strength, danger, and wildness, yet God does not call their wildness evil or apologize for their place in creation. He speaks of them as creatures still under His lordship. Job is being pulled out of the small courtroom of human explanation into a world too vast for easy formulas. Grief can stay honest, shallow blame can be rejected, and the human mind can still stand before a wisdom larger than its control.
#### Hiddenness, Honest Nonbelief, and Responsibility
Another hard question runs beside suffering: many people are not actively resisting God; they simply do not think they have enough light to believe. [^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-1] For example, someone may grow up where there is little Christian witness, or someone may pray honestly for years and still feel unconvinced. That should be taken seriously, not mocked. People are formed in different environments. In the language of our AI analogy, their inputs are uneven across cultures, families, and eras. Scripture treats that unevenness as morally relevant: God judges justly according to the "light" (the input) each person was given (Rom 2:12--16, NIV), and He is not far from any of us (Acts 17:26--27, NIV).
Four relations interact here. Every person depends ontologically on the Logos for existence; people have unequal epistemic access to truth about God; some explicitly recognize Christ while others do not; and saving participation in Christ is the work of grace by the Spirit. Those relations converge differently in each life. Explicit nonrecognition can therefore coexist with a sincere response to the light actually received.
The more light we receive, the more responsibility we carry (Luke 12:47--48; Jas 3:1, NIV). This is not just about knowing the name of Jesus or carrying a Christian label. It is about real understanding, real capacity, and real trust. [^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-2] That is serious. But that responsibility does not earn salvation; salvation is by grace (Eph 2:8--9, NIV). It shapes stewardship and calling. People are entrusted with different work in God's kingdom, and are accountable for what they were given (Eph 2:10; 1 Cor 12:4--7, NIV). So Christian witness should sound like humility, patience, and service. Our task is to live and speak faithfully, not to treat every doubter as a rebel by default. Family, culture, trust, and life experience all shape what people can recognize and believe, which is why formed freedom matters so deeply (chapter "Refining Souls: Free Will and Who We Become").
Proportional judgment according to real light, capacity, and response is a firm biblical claim. DDF's further coherence conclusion now has to be stated plainly. Nonculpable lack of adequate contact with Christ cannot itself become the ground of irreversible condemnation. Before an irrevocable personal outcome, God must give person-indexed, Christ-centered disclosure adequate for a truthful and responsible response, healing relevant incapacity rather than blaming the wound. For anyone who never receives such disclosure in mortal life, this entails at least a trans-mortem encounter at resurrection and judgment. This is one Christ-centered disclosure in which Christ alone saves and the person's actual response remains real, so it neither guarantees universalism nor opens an endless series of chances. [^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-3]
The conclusion resolves the judgment contradiction while leaving Schellenberg's harder relational loss in full view. A person may have been deprived during mortal life of trust, consolation, worship, moral clarity, or consciously reciprocal communion. Final disclosure must therefore include healing, unveiling, and fitting repair of those damaged relational goods. Why a loving God permits particular periods of nonresistant hiddenness remains evidential pressure even when the temporal wound is finally healed.
So evil is real, and suffering is real. Some questions remain hard. But this is not the final state of reality. The biblical story moves toward the defeat of death and the renewal of creation. That means humans are not bystanders. Under God, part of our vocation is to participate in that restoring work now: resisting cruelty, pursuing justice, and stewarding life, including the care of animals (Gen 1:28; Prov 12:10, NIV). Reality is not yet at the end state, but the promised end is a healed creation where harm is no longer the rule.
[^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-1]: J. L. Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993; revised paperback ed., 2006); Andrew Blanton, Non-Resistant Non-Belief Is Pervasive, Religious Studies (2025), DOI: 10.1017/S0034412525101261.
[^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-2]: Jesus' parable of the talents says the master gave to each servant "according to his ability" (Matthew 25:15 (NIV)), then held each servant accountable for what was entrusted (Matt 25:14--30, NIV).
[^hiddenness-honest-nonbelief-and-responsibility-3]: John 5:28--29; Romans 2:16; 1 Corinthians 4:5; Philippians 2:10--11; 1 Peter 3:18--20 and 4:6. The Petrine texts are exegetically disputed, but the early trajectory is wider than a modern innovation: Irenaeus, Against Heresies IV.22.1; Justin Martyr, First Apology 46; Clement of Alexandria, Stromata VI.6.
### Decay as a Current in Creation
Repair is hard, and drift feels easy, because the problem includes both individual choices and the environment we live in. Physics describes physical transformation; Scripture names moral and spiritual corruption within that same created world.
The second law of thermodynamics says that the total entropy of an isolated system does not decrease. Entropy is a physical state quantity related to accessible microstates and the dispersal of energy under specified constraints. Local structure can increase while total entropy increases: stars form, crystals grow, storms organize, and embryos develop. [^decay-as-a-current-in-creation-1]
Living bodies are open systems. They maintain far-from-equilibrium organization through flows of usable energy and matter, continual replacement, regulation, and repair. A neglected room, eroding sandcastle, aging body, and cooling gas involve different mechanisms. Entropy places real constraints on all physical work, but it is not one universal explanation for every kind of breakdown.
Scripture speaks about this at a deeper theological level. Paul writes that "the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay" (Romans 8:21 (NIV)). Creation---not just individual hearts or invisible "spiritual realms"---groans under corruption. The word Paul uses, phthora, names ruin, decay, and breakdown.
The early church spoke this way too. Athanasius said that humanity, once it turned from God, was "going to ruin, and turning again toward non-existence by the way of corruption," and that it would be unworthy of God to let what He had made simply waste away. Augustine explained evil as a privation of good (good that has been damaged): not a rival substance, but a lack, a wound, in something that was originally good. Their insight is about good creatures losing integrity, relation, and participated life.
Adamic rebellion enters an already finite natural history as a new human and covenantal rupture. Creaturely mortality, predation, and extinction can precede Adam, while humanity's Godward vocation, human relationships, and stewardship become bent under Sin. Bodily death now reigns within the human story as enemy and accusation; social and ecological harm spread through disordered rule; and the creation's older finitude is caught up in a history awaiting liberation with redeemed humanity.
Entropy remains a feature of the physical order, not a measure of moral guilt. Yet finite bodies, communities, and ecosystems all reveal how dependent created order is on continuing gift, regulation, repair, and, finally, the God who raises and renews it.
Physical breakdown can therefore supply an analogy for moral neglect while personal, social, historical, and spiritual causes carry the moral account.
[^decay-as-a-current-in-creation-1]: OpenStax, University Physics Volume 2, sec. 3.1, Thermodynamic Systems; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Second law of thermodynamics.
### The Inner Version of the Drift
The physical picture gives us an image for inward drift. Moral failure has personal, social, historical, and spiritual causes of its own, and it often exploits the path of least immediate resistance.
Virtue costs something: attention, self-control, patience, sacrificial love. Those choices feel like effort because they are effort. Neglect can demand less in the immediate moment while imposing greater costs on the person and community later. If you stop tending your inner life, you do not quietly drift into humility and kindness; you harden. If you stop guarding your habits, you do not drift into holiness by accident. Left alone, we sag inward the way an untended building slowly sags into ruin.
Lies follow the same pattern.
Truth has structure and clarity, like a strong, clean broadcast. Lies, half-truths, and constant spin act like static, slowly filling the channel until the signal blurs. Jesus calls the devil "a liar and the father of lies" (John 8:44 (NIV)). The goal is not always to make you buy one clever false story. Often it is simply to surround you with so much distortion that you stop believing clear truth is even possible.
This decay reaches all the way into our bodies. Life is a continual fight against breakdown, our cells burning energy to repair damage and hold complex systems together. Death is what happens when that resistance ceases and the body returns to dust, just as Genesis says: "for dust you are and to dust you will return" (Genesis 3:19 (NIV)). Paul stretches that experience of mortality across the whole creation, describing creation that "has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth" (Romans 8:22 (NIV)) under a shared burden of decay.
Because of this, the first Christians did not see sin as only a private moral problem or salvation as a private escape. They believed God intended to heal the same creation that now groans. Through Christ, God aims "to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven" (Colossians 1:20 (NIV)), and promises that "the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay" (Romans 8:21 (NIV)). Salvation is not just God erasing your guilt; it is the beginning of a renewal that reaches from your heart into the very fabric of the world.
Into that collapsing order, Scripture makes a clear claim: "He is before all things, and in him all things hold together" (Colossians 1:17 (NIV)). God is not a distant engineer who wound up the universe and stepped away. He is the living sustainer who keeps it from falling apart and who, in Christ, has already begun its healing. Prayer, repentance, obedience, and love are not decorative extras. They are how we stay joined to the Source who can push back against the drift. Sanctification is not self-repair by sheer willpower; it is cooperation with the One who already holds us, and everything else, together.
The drift does not need one dramatic collapse. Often it only needs neglect: one avoided repair, one tolerated lie, one wound left unnamed, one small surrender repeated until it begins to feel normal.
The final word over creation is not decay. Revelation ends with God wiping away tears and removing death, mourning, crying, and pain (Rev 21:4, NIV). Until then, categories keep us truthful. Not every pain is personal guilt, but personal guilt is real. The world's groaning now leads us to the heart's misalignment.