---
schema_version: "1.0.0"
id: "ddf-church-blueprint:en:chapter-13"
work_id: "urn:systemstheology:book:ddf-church-blueprint:chapter:chapter-13"
book_id: "ddf-church-blueprint"
chapter_id: "11-name-the-power-people-actually-carry"
chapter_slug: "chapter-13"
title: "11. Name the Power People Actually Carry"
book_title: "DDF Church Blueprint"
language: "en"
source_language: "en"
translation_status: "source"
authors: ["Systems Theology"]
editorial_owner: "Systems Theology"
editors: []
review_status: "not_specified"
reviewers: []
content_version: "content-115e51c0aa5e"
content_hash_sha256: "115e51c0aa5e557da19fe19870fbafdb37561c5b5ad82c0f08adf8eb20ef6a4b"
published_at: "2026-07-15T21:14:45.000Z"
modified_at: "2026-07-15T23:50:19.254Z"
canonical_url: "https://systemstheology.com/library/ddf-church-blueprint/chapter-13/"
markdown_url: "https://systemstheology.com/research/books/ddf-church-blueprint/en/chapter-13.md"
license: "All rights reserved; research use subject to the Use Policy"
license_url: "https://systemstheology.com/use-policy/"
correction_url: "https://systemstheology.com/library/ddf-church-blueprint/chapter-13/#chapter-comments"
---
# 11. Name the Power People Actually Carry
The Church does not solve corruption by distrusting all office. It does not solve it by treating ordination, gifting, success, or apostolic language as proof against corruption. Office is received for service and tested in the life it produces.
First Timothy 3 and Titus 1 give more space to observable character than to platform skill. The repeated concern is that an overseer be above reproach, self-controlled, hospitable, able to teach, not violent, not controlled by money, tested in household life, and well regarded. The Greek dokimazo and related testing language refuse instant elevation. First Peter directs shepherds away from compulsion, greed, and domination. Third John exposes the Diotrephes pattern: a leader who loves preeminence, rejects correction, weaponizes speech, blocks hospitality, and expels those who resist.
## Qualification Is More Than Absence of Scandal
Assess the whole relation between person, office, and community:
- confession and ability to handle Scripture truthfully;
- prayer, repentance, humility, and willingness to receive care;
- sexual integrity, sobriety, money, anger, speech, and use of force;
- hospitality and treatment of people with little status;
- household relationships without treating a spouse or child as a credential;
- work history, reputation, and patterns across settings;
- response to correction, contradiction, failure, and another person's success;
- ability to keep confidence without using secrecy;
- understanding of role limits, referral, protection, and due process;
- capacity for the actual work and willingness to share it.
Background checks may expose relevant history, but a clear check is not a character finding. References should include people chosen by the candidate and, where lawful and appropriate, people who observed the candidate under pressure. Ask concrete behavioral questions. Record who reviewed the material, how long it is retained, and what information may lawfully be considered.
## Slow Access
Separate belonging, gift, office, and access. A new person may belong before leading. A gifted person may serve under supervision before holding office. An ordained person may still need local review before receiving money, keys, children's access, confidential records, counseling responsibility, or sole teaching authority.
Create access levels for:
- public participation;
- ordinary volunteer service;
- child, youth, or vulnerable-person contact;
- keys, facilities, transport, and overnight activity;
- money, payment systems, and donor information;
- member, pastoral, personnel, and safeguarding records;
- public teaching, counseling, sacramental ministry, and governance.
Each level needs qualification, training, approval, expiry or review, and a way to suspend access quickly. Do not let technology grant permissions merely because someone knows how to use the platform.
## Informal Power
Map people who control information, relationships, money, social belonging, the planter's emotional state, volunteer schedules, technical systems, or public narrative without holding formal office. Informal influence can be a gift. It becomes dangerous when the church's accountability map ignores it.
Ask annually: Who can stop a proposal without appearing in the minutes? Who decides which concern reaches leaders? Whose donation changes the room? Who is considered "family" and therefore exempt from ordinary process? Who knows all the passwords? Who can make a volunteer socially disappear?
Bring important informal functions into defined roles or reduce their unreviewed control. Do not punish influence merely for being informal; make its responsibility visible.
## Review, Rest, and Removal
Every leader needs a written role, supervisor or accountable body, goals tied to the received life, regular feedback from more than one direction, rest, development, compensation clarity where applicable, and a review date. The review should include people who experience the leader's work, not only people who benefit from the leader's success.
Define grounds and processes for correction, leave, restriction, suspension, removal, and appeal before a case arises. Immediate protective action may be needed before a final finding. A temporary access limit is not a declaration of guilt. A final finding should not be disguised as indefinite "leave." Tell the truth about the stage.
Restoration to communion is not the same as restoration to office. A person may be forgiven, cared for, and fully received as a Christian while remaining disqualified from a particular office or access. Some failures reveal a temporary need for formation; others destroy the trust or qualification the office requires. The desire for a redemptive story cannot govern the decision.
Before you move on. Role charters, qualification and reference forms, an access matrix, informal-power review, leader review schedule, and removal-and-appeal process.